Who reported the game sat, was he even there? the 1st goal was a sweet flowing football from left wing to centre of pitch involving scott, rikki, scott, dimms, scott, curtis, scott goal.!! the second an individual goal from a twisting, feinting rikki from left wing to about the same position before scoring. Is it a bad view from the far end stand? was it carbon monoxide poisioning from the road behind it?? to prove my point i just have to point out that although the score was correct 2-1, we were home to Deal not away to faversham as the page showed, come on review the video evidence...lol

Stew reviewed the match (as clearly stated on the page, using his own name, "Harry"). It did say "Faversham" as I copied the page but forgot to alter the heading. Having to manage three websites and writing two sports reports every weekend, I try hard to ensure accuracy however mistakes do occasionally creep in, so I obviously didn't pay enough attention, and I apologise for the error.

Having read your description and compaired this to Stews report, I fail to see what the problem is. You have, perhaps elabourated further on the build up, but it seems that Stew has still reported fact and it seems that he has described what you saw, but in a slightly different way to how you would have reported it. If you have such a big problem with this "Harry," then perhaps we'll leave all the report writing to you, unless, once again, you just want to just stir up conversation on the message board.

Harry....get a life!

Maybe if Stu was getting paid to do this then people would have the right to criticise, but no, he does it all in his own time and for nothing.